On Top List

Owner
Add blog to our blog directory.

Thursday, September 29, 2011

My Airport Operations

Just wanted to share this with everyone. 

By Betsy Hudson
    If you are one of over 400 million people who have a profile on Facebook, you will understand my excitement when I stumbled upon a new website "created by airport operators for airport operators" - My Airport Operations.
    After recently being introduced to Facebook by my teenage boys, I created a profile and suddenly I am overwhelmed with friends! Many are from my high school graduating class of '85! OMG! I enjoyed catching up with old friends and sharing real life stories on Facebook, so when I found this professional networking group focused on airports, I had to join.
    My Airport Operations is a place where you will discover a wealth of information at your fingertips through the online community. It is a convenient way to find assistance with compliance and maintenance issues, share ideas, training, concerns, or just boast about your airport. The purpose of the MAO online community is for members to assist each other with operations issues by exchanging experiences and knowledge. Essentially, it's Facebook designed for aviation professionals.
    So, whether if you are looking to network, share ideas, find solutions, seek training, etc., you can find it online at www.myairportoperations.com. My handle is BHudson - be sure to network with me!

Monday, September 26, 2011

FAR Part 77 Objections Affecting Navigable Airspace

FAR Part 77 is one of the most important aspects that must be considered when operating an airport. A duty of airport operations is to keep a close eye on what is happening around the field. It is very common to see unauthorized cranes just boom up. They must have an airspace study performed. If construction is planned within 20,000 ft of an airport or exceeds 200 ft in height, a study must be performed. The form a contractor is required to fill out for this study, FAA form 7460-1 can be downloaded here.
For those interested in how the primary and transitional surfaces around an airport are designated and defined I have provided two videos. For more information please go to www.myairportoperations.com

 


Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Air Race Fans, Despite Crash, Remain Steadfast

RENO, Nev. — The fans come here each year looking for, even craving, the thrill they say they get only from seeing planes race at speeds of more than 400 miles per hour. At a small airport at the edge of the city, they tilt their heads skyward for hours, relishing each roar overhead. Fans remeber
And as fans trickled in Monday to line up at the memorial that had cropped along the fence along the airport, a tribute to those who died after a plane crashed into the crowd Friday, they said they were determined to make sure that air races would go on again here next year.
Hospital officials said Monday that a 10th person had died from the crash in which a P-51 Mustang nosedived into the crowd at the National Championship Air Races and Air Show at Reno-Stead Airport. Four other patients were in critical condition at local hospitals.
But the crash did not deter the fans, who came to the memorial with a steely somberness. It was a freakish accident, they said, a one-in-a-million thing. Attending these races is dangerous, sure, they said, but so is driving. What should change? For the most part, they replied, absolutely nothing.
“The show must go on, even with something this tragic,” said Anna Marie Murphy, 44, who has come to the races since she was a child, when her family had a passion for building and flying small planes. She knew eight people who died in plane accidents, including her aunt and uncle, she said.
 “I know that people die in this,” she said. “I don’t want it to happen, but I know I have to accept it might. And anyone who comes here better know it, too.”
Each year some 200,000 people attend the event, in which planes race around an eight-mile course. With a combination of air acrobatics and high speeds, the race is far more adrenaline pumping than air shows and car races. Many of the most ardent fans are pilots themselves, who know well the dangers.
“You are open to a certain kind of experience if you come here,” said Ross Kallenberger, a private pilot in Bakersfield, Calif., who saw the crash. He motioned to the vintage planes taking off at that moment. “Can you feel them? How often do you come to an event that you can actually physically feel through your body? There’s nothing like it.”
For the last 17 years, Bob Johnson and Scott Koerner, retired pilots, have come to the event with their wives. The couples, who also witnessed the accident, wore their custom-made polo shirts, with stitching in the back declaring them air race “junkies.” This year, the Koerners paid for their daughter and her husband to fly from Nashville to see the show for the first time. Their son-in-law, Ben Cissell, photographed scenes of the crash that were shown on the “Today” show on Monday.
They thought about the risks now and then, especially when an accident in 2007 scattered debris through the field, in one of three accidents that killed pilots that year.
“You don’t have to be a brain surgeon to realize that there are risks to coming here,” Mr. Johnson said.
His wife, Jan Johnson, believes strongly that the races should continue, and she said she was certain she would return to watch them. “This is a completely one-of-a-kind event, and we love every minute of it,” she said.
The fans were already anticipating new regulations. Would officials try to move the race to a less populated area? Would they place the course farther away from the stands?
But they dismissed those options. Moving a course a mile or two away would hardly matter given the speed of the planes, they reasoned. And being farther away from the city would only increase the risk of spectators getting into car accidents, they said.
Reno Air Race Crash
The only opening for change may have to come from pilots themselves, said Dennis Gleason, 70, a retired plane mechanic who spent years working for Boeing. The pilot of the plane that crashed, Jimmy Leeward, was 74 and an experienced stunt pilot. Still, Mr. Gleason said, pilots should consider creating a self-imposed age limit.
“You can lose some of your sharpness, some of your reflexes,” Mr. Gleason said. “Those maneuvers are sharp and precise. I’m sure he was an excellent pilot, but you can’t help but wonder if he was alert enough to notice the smallest mistake.”
Ike Shim, 63, traveled from Tokyo for the last seven years to watch the race. The way he sees it, changing the race would be akin to a philosophical defeat.
“Any kind of endeavor that is about human progress is going to have some risk,” Mr. Shim said. “That’s how we move forward and advance. If we stop taking risks, we stop living.”
At least one message left at the memorial seemed to echo Mr. Shim’s sentiment.
“Jimmy’s flying with the best of ’em now,” the card read. It ended with the motto of the Reno races. “Let’s honor him the best way we can: fly low, fly fast and turn left.”

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Airport Security

In the world of Airport Operations, we tend to spend a great deal of time focused on airfield and airside issues. This is as it should be, since we are to be the Subject Matter Experts on such matters, capable of providing sound guidance and information to those relying upon us for both maintaining safety as well as decision-making. However, most of us are also involved in the security aspects at our respective airports, whether it is in formalized roles as Airport Security Coordinators or merely remaining vigilant and coordinating with local Law Enforcement.
Since that is the case, it might be extremely beneficial to spend a few minutes considering the concept of Terminal Security. We usually focus on the Secure Areas and keeping them sterile, but what about the public side? Most of our time is spent on the possibility of explosive devices – unattended or suspicious bags and vehicles located near the terminal. While these are the tried and true methods generally used by terrorists around the world, there is another, even harder to detect, threat that we should be aware of and seriously consider: an Active Shooter.

Consider the following:

  • On May 22, 2002, a man dining in a Denny’s restaurant across from the Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport (MSY) felt that a Southwest employee had been ridiculing his attire, specifically a turban. He followed her back into the Ticket Lobby, and shot her once in the stomach with a sawed-off 12-gauge shotgun. An airport employee (!) wrestled the weapon from him and the man was placed under arrest. The Southwest employee later recovered from her wounds

  • On July 4, 2002 a man opened fire in the ticket lobby area at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), near the El Al counter, killing two and wounding three others before being shot dead.

  • On March 2, 2011 a gunman opened fire on a bus containing US Air Force service members at the airport in Frankfurt, Germany, killing two and wounding two more. After the incident, the gunman fled into the terminal of the airport where he was arrested by authorities.

  • In the hit video game Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, a pivotal scene is where a group of Russian terrorists conduct a massacre at a fictional Moscow airport, with the intent to begin a “false flag” operation against the United States. The player participates in the incident, and graphic examples of violence against unarmed civilians and security personnel ensue (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKqD3jHflOU)

  • Just last week, a man armed with an AK-47 variant walked into an IHOP restaurant in Carson City, NV and opened fire. The assailant killed four, wounded seven, and then took his own life.

Terminal Security


We generally think of security in terms of checkpoints and fencing--all attempts to prevent the introduction of hazardous or lethal objects on board an aircraft. While the events of the September 11th terrorist attacks certainly justify such an approach, we should also give brief thought to the concept of preventing a mass-casualty incident at terminal facilities.
One particular cause for concern is the possibility of either single or multiple armed persons entering the public side of an airport terminal in order to cause casualties. The term “Active Shooter” has been developed by Law Enforcement agencies to define this type of incident. The term was developed after studying the Columbine High School shootings in the mid 1990s, and those fitting the term pose a difficult, and lethal, threat to large gatherings of people.

Methodology


The Active Shooter represents a paradigm shift in the intent and methodology of hostile acts against civilians; in the mid-1970s and 1980s, terrorists would take hostages in order to gain a form of public leverage in order to accomplish a goal, be it the release of imprisoned colleagues or gain notoriety for their cause. As such, Law Enforcement adapted over time to face such a threat, resulting in the Hostage Rescue Teams we see today. A crucial element of hostage incidents is that of time; where the aggressor usually holes up in a place and waits for their demands to be made. This gives the responding agencies time to either meet the demands or plan for a less diplomatic way to end the situation.
With the Active Shooter, the element of time disappears. According to the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office, an Active Shooter is “…an armed person who has used deadly physical force on other persons and continues to do so while having unrestricted access to additional victims.” In short, the person is heavily armed, walks in, and continues killing others until they are killed or disabled themselves. There is no time to gather negotiators, argue over demands, or deploy specialized teams. As such, it is imperative that police immediately pursue and engage such a threat as soon as possible.
This methodology has been conducted by those that are criminally insane, such as Jared Loughner, the mentally-disturbed man charged with the Tucson AZ shooting in which six were killed and fourteen wounded, as well as the gunman in the IHOP situation mentioned earlier. However, this method may well prove to be especially attractive to those with terrorist ties; again, while most of our focus is upon foiling rather complicated attempts to turn an aircraft into a flying Weapon of Mass Destruction, the simple, low-technology approach of so-called “Lone Wolf” attacks may not receive the same attention. These methods have seen some growth in popularity among terrorist groups overseas due to their lack of necessary planning, simple equipment needs, and disturbingly effective results; one thinks of the Fort Hood shooting, in which a single man with two handguns killed 13 and wounded 30 more.

Prevention


Naturally, the purpose of an airport terminal is to provide efficient and pleasurable service to passengers seeking to board an aircraft; as such, it cannot become an armed camp in order to prevent an attack. Short of installing metal detectors at all entrances, there are few if any scientific methods of preventing such an attack before it begins. With that being said, there are some skills that Operators can develop and teach that may help with detection:
  • A person wearing heavy clothing, such as a coat, in warmer weather is usually a sure sign of something concealed, be it a weapon or explosive device.
  • Suspicious behavior may be noted prior to the beginning of the assault, such as pacing back and forth, profuse sweating, fidgeting, and talking to themselves.
  • If a person is concealing a weapon in their clothing, there are certain visual cues and behaviors that can be noted by the trained eye; as they approach a crowd of people, they tend to turn the side with the weapon away from the crowd, lest someone bump into them and note that they are concealing a large metal object. If it is not secured in a holster, they will generally place their hand on it to keep it from shifting as they move, or they may constantly reach to the area to reposition the weapon. If they run, they may also keep their hand on the weapon to keep it from falling out or shifting in their clothing.

Unfortunately, while these methods may help detect a hostile act before it begins, it is more likely that the first real indication of an incident will be the sound of shots fired. As such, it is crucial that LEOs are trained to respond quickly to such an incident; in most Active Shooter cases, the assault did not stop until the assailant was disabled or they ran out of ammunition. While such an incident is not required by the FAA to be a part of our AEP (or ASP, for that matter), it would be an excellent idea to bring up the concept of response methods with the Lieutenant or Sergeant that oversees the LEO force at your airport. Remember: none of the airports, or restaurants, or schools, mentioned here ever considered that it could happen at their location either.
While the subject of this article is not a pleasant one (in fact the concept can be downright disturbing) I certainly hope that the possibility of these incidents has stimulated thought within our fairly small community. The few hours’ consideration of such a threat, and contingency plans to deal with it, may well save a number of lives in the future, though one hopes it remains a conjectural exercise.

-Brandon Guillot

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Small Airports On Terror Alert

Regional Airports Could Be Targeted By Terrorists Because Of Smaller Planes

POSTED: 9:13 pm MDT September 5, 2011
Small AircraftUPDATED: 10:52 pm MDT September 5, 2011
Small airports are on alert across the country with the ten year anniversary of 9/11 just one week away. The FBI and Department of Homeland Security have issued warnings about possible terrorist attacks using small planes.The impact of that warning could be felt across the Western Slope where nearly every airport is home to dozens of single-engine aircraft.We spoke with passengers at Grand Junction Regional Airport about the warning and possibility of another attack on September 11.Ten years ago this month, terrorists brought the Twin Towers down in the largest attack ever on U.S. soil. Separate hijackings and plane crashes in Washington, D.C. and Pennsylvania were also part of the plan and left a hole in the Pentagon while taking the lives of thousands of Americans.For one man caught in the middle of that tragedy, the anniversary brings back frightening memories. "Knowing what had happened to the Twin Towers and all of a sudden hearing something that felt to me like a safe landing on top of the floor above me," retired Army Major General Bill Bond said while waiting for a flight home out of Grand Junction. "I was in the Pentagon."Bond was in the "A Ring" and just yards from the "E Ring" that was hit by the plane. "So, I really could feel it," he said. "There was definitely a fire going on, you could see the smoke."Traveling now with his family, Bond always has the thought of those attacks in the back of his mind. But, he's still not convinced there will be another attack this month."I think it will pass... I'm much more likely to probably die from an automobile accident. Those are real concerns that we as Americans ought to have."Federal security officials, on the other hand, are not so sure.They have issued a national warning about Al Qaeda threats of using small planes at regional airports. And, western Colorado is home to dozens of those facilities."The threats are real and the stakes are high, we believe that we face a determined enemy who has not given up," John Pistole with the TSA said.Experts believe Al Qaeda may be shying away from the more massive attacks by planning smaller ones - using single-engine planes - that are less complicated."These planes are small you might not be able to put some huge device aboard them but the other side of that is if you were to put some biological or chemical agent in one of them, clearly that could cause some major damage depending on your target," Brad Garrett, a security consultant and former FBI agent, told ABC's Good Morning America.Federal officials are hoping to notify as many of these airports as possible before the weekend. Still though, Bond remains hopeful that nothing will happen."If we give into those fears, then we give into the terrorists," he said. "That's what they're trying to accomplish with anything."On average, each United States airport is home to 57 general aviation planes. The government admits that the number may be too much for them to monitor alone, but officials are still working to alert pilots all over the country.
Small Aircraft

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Self Service Fueling Nightmare Stories

Here is an article about self-service fueling station. Self-Service Fueling Stations I know many of the members do not deal with the fueling of aircraft but you have tenants (FBO operators) that do. During the Arkansas Airport Operators Association (AAOA) Annual meeting my director is going to give a presentation on the need to conduct daily/monthly/annual inspections. To those that conduct these inspections it would seem unheard of not doing them, but there are a few small operations that purchase these systems, fill them with fuel and forget about them till they are empty.
I need stories of bad self service stations, I will not use your name or airport unless given permission. I will use the stories and information to develop a power point presentation. This power point presentation will educate AAOA members of the dangers of not properly maintaining their fuel systems.
Please send me any pictures or information of a bad/good system.